Saturday 21 April 2012

HOMOSEXUALITY

'First, to map out the boundaries within which all discussion must go on, I take it for certain that the physical satisfaction of homosexual desires is sin. This leaves the homo. no worse off that any normal person who is, for whatever reason, prevented from marrying. Second our speculations on the cause of the abnormality are not what matters and we must be content with ignorance. The disciples were not told why (in terms of efficient cause) the man was born blind (Jn.IX 1-3): only the final cause, that the works of God shd. be made manifest in him.
This suggests that in homosexuality, as in every other tribulation, those works can be made manifest: i.e. that every disability conceals a vocation, if only we find it. wh. would "turn the necessity to glorious gain." Of course, the first step must be to accept any privations wh., if so disbaled, we can't lawfully get. The homo. has to accept sexual abstience just as the poor man has to forgo otherwise lawful pleasures becuase he wd. be unjust to his wife and childrenn if he took them. That is merely a negative condition.
What shd. the positive life of the homo. be? I wish I had a letter wh. a pious male homo., now dead, once wrote to me - but of course it was the sort of letter one takes care to destroy. He believed that his necessity could  be turned to spiritual gian: that there were certain kinds of sympathy and understanding, a certain social role which mere men and mere women cd. not give. But is is all horribly vague - too long ago. Perhaps any homo. who humbly accepts his cross and puts himself under Divine guidance will, however, be shown the way. I am sure that any attempt to evade it (e.g., by mock- or quasi-marriage with a member of one's own sex even if this does not led to any carnal act) is the wrong way.'
 CS Lewis in Walter Hooper (Ed)., The Collected Letters of CS Lewis Vol III, p.471.